100% | The content of the text in question is grouped with high logic. The main features of the text are displayed in a concise and incisive manner.

80-90% | The content of the text in question is well grouped. The main features of the text are coherently displayed.

60-70% | The content of the text in question is sufficiently organized, although a lack of coherence is at times visible.

40-50% | The assignment suffers from a lack in organization and coherence.

20-30% | Topics seem to be randomly picked and aligned; there is virtually no coherence or organization visible.

0-10% | The assignment suffers from an absence in logic in the display of the source’s content.

100% | Excellent balance between the representation of main features, structure or general principles and the omission of minor details.

80-90% | Good balance between the representation of main features, structure or general principles and the omission of minor details.

60-70% | The main features, structure or general principle of the text in question are only partially displayed, and / or many details are presented.

40-50% | Some main features, structure or general principles are given, but the overall balance of the content ratio is flawed.

20-30% | The overall balance of main features and minor details is heavily flawed.

0-10% | The incoherent display of main features and minor details suggest a lack of understanding of the text in question.

100% | The text’s original meaning is excellently reworded, while the content stays true to its original meaning.

80-90% | The text’s original meaning is sufficiently paraphrased. A great resemblance to the original meaning can be observed.

60-70% | The paraphrasing of the text’s original meaning is attempted, but there are some flaws to be recognized. There is a resemblance to the original meaning.

40-50% | The paraphrasing of the text’s original meaning is vaguely attempted; the assignment only barely displays the content of the text in question.

20-30% | Large parts of the text in question are taken over word for word, often in the form of inappropriate or missing quotations.

0-10% | In terms of content transfer, the displayed assignment cannot be considered as an own accomplishment.

100% | A usage of language that is virtually free of any errors. Almost no violations of the linguistic norm. The comprehensibility can be considered as effortless throughout the full assignment.

80-90% | Language which is to a great extent free of errors. Only a few violations of the linguistic norm; good comprehensibility.

60-70% | Appropriate use of language. Some offences against the linguistic norm, but the text can still be easily understood.

40-50% | Acceptable use of language. Occasionally also grave offences against the linguistic norm; in some places the comprehensibility is flawed.

20-30% | Barely acceptable use of language; a lot of partly grave offences against the linguistic norm; the comprehensibility is seriously flawed.

0-10% | The use of language does not satisfy the assignment and the demands of this task.

100% | A rich and differentiated use of vocabulary and idioms, highly appropriate in its register, is shown in an excellent rewording of the original model of the text in question..

80-90% | An accurate use of vocabulary and idioms, appropriate in its register, is shown in a well-fitting rewording of the original model of the text in question. .

60-70% | A to a large extent secure use of basic vocabulary, acceptable register, but there are occasionally troubles to rephrase the original text.

40-50% | Use of a simple and limited vocabulary, that still attempts to rephrase the original text. The register might not always be appropriate.

20-30% | A lack of vocabulary and idiomatic range is shown by excessive use of whole phrases taken over from the text in question.

0-10% | An own accomplishment in using vocabulary and idioms cannot be recognized and / or the register is unacceptable. Full passages might be copied.

100% | A differentiated use of grammatical and syntactic structures of all complexity levels. Grammatical tenses are suitable to the requested text format throughout the full assignment.

80-90% | To a great extent differentiated use of rather complex syntactic and grammatical structures. Only slight errors in tense or structure usage.

60-70% | Appropriate use of grammatical and syntactic structures, but rather basic. There are certain difficulties in forming complex sentences.

40-50% | Use of simple grammatical and syntactic structures as well as a significant number of errors in tense or structure usage.

20-30% | Repetitive use of sentence structures; numerous mistakes in tense or structural usage.

0-10% | The grammatical complexity does not satisfy the formal nature of the task.

100% | Excellent use of structural elements.

80-90% | Good use of structural elements.

60-70% | Satisfying use of structural elements.

40-50% | Structural elements are only occasionally used and are often unsuitable.

20-30% |Missing or unsuitable use of structural elements.

0-10% | The usage of structural elements does not fulfil the requirements of the task.